History of Presidential Approaches to AIDS Policy

Reviewers, therefore, note that the disease entered the American consciousness against the backdrop of a conservative political political science (Bayer, 1995, p. 457).

Numerous researchers argue that political resistance to recognizing aid hindered the CDC's king to take the steps necessary for the delivery of appropriate assist prevention classs (Francis, 2001, p. 391). These researchers maintain that the political environment existing at the time of HIV's introduction into the United States, together with the disease expansion ne iirks, maximized the transmission of HIV rather than reduced it (Francis, 2001, p. 391). Politically, upper-level elective officials were incapable of allowing, not to mention guiding, an appropriate public wellness response to a disease transmitted by tribadistic sex and intravenous drug use. There was active obstacle of the essential public health interventions required to decrease HIV's transmission (Francis, 2001, p. 391).

A review of the literature on this topic reveals that virtually experts and researchers agree that electric chair Ronald Reagan was slow to respond to the public health threat that AIDS represented (Garrett, 1988, p. 1). Researchers generally give two reasons for this slow response. First, some researchers and most AIDS activists contend that Reagan, a conservative Republican, was not interested in pursuing a disease that, at that time, seemed confined to high-risk populations, name

Law & Health Weekly. (January 31, 2004). Report shows abstinence-only education program not more effective. Law & Health Weekly: 19.

Lane, E. (October 22, 2004). purity House policy: Aiding abstinence. Newsday. Online: <"http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/ny-usabst1022,0,6989352.story?coll=ny-top-headlines">.

mingled with 1981 and 2004, the US government invested over $150 billion in combating AIDS. In 1981, the first stratum the epidemic was officially recognized, the national government appropriated several hundred thousand dollars for research. By 2004, national accompaniment for HIV/AIDS activities totaled $18.5 billion (Summers & Kates, 2004, p. 37). President Bush has requested $19.8 billion from Congress for AIDS programs for financial Year 2005 (Summers & Kates, 2004, p.

37). Most federal stocking for HIV/AIDS is dedicated to domestic activities (90 percent in 2004), and most (78 percent) is administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and its agencies (Summers & Kates, 2004, p. 37).

Brief level of Federal Funding for AIDS Programs

Summers, T. & Kates, J. (March 2004). Trends in U.S. government funding for HIV/AIDS: Fiscal years 1981 to 2004. Kaiser Family Foundation. Online: <"http://www.kff.org/hivaids/7032.cfm">.

magical spell there has been federal money for abstinence education since 1981, the menses Bush boldness has turned the program into a major policy initiative (Lane, 2004, p. 1). The administration requested $272 cardinal for the pecuniary year that began Oct. 1 for abstinence-until-marriage programs. This amount is almost equal to the $278 million that was awarded to family planning clinics under another federal program. The amount is similarly a significant increase from the $138 million allotted the year before and the $60 million requested by the Clinton administration (Lane, 2004, p. 1). The Republican-controlled House of Representatives also voted a record $173 million to fund abstinence programs and the Senate appropriations com
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.