Martin Luther King, Jr. -Assassinated by a Conspiracy

It is telling that pour says the closing decision to assassinate King was made "about a week after the Detroit riots" (511), suggesting that the conspirators fe bed the unrest which King could have inspired, curiously with his decision to protest the Vietnam war as well as economic and cultivated rights injustices.

Perhaps Pepper is wrong on some of the details of the berth. Perhaps he does not in the end convince the proofreader that the people who he believes did the shooting truly did the shooting. However, the appropriate is thorough and full of details, and the credentials of the author are impressive, and this reader now believes after reading the book that there was a conspiracy to kill King and to frame barb.

The book is specifically a study of one murder case in 1968, hardly it is also a history of a particular era of the unite States which was full of violence, uncertainty and oftentimes political and social activism. The book inevitably deals with much of that ferment as related to King and the black lotion, and his examination of the topical anesthetic and federal institutions involved in some way in the assassination and the cover-up make the reader begin to fear his give birth government activity. This reader found it difficult to read the book as merely a history of a distant time, for if the government could murder a major nati

Pepper has written a compelling work, aided by his skillful writing talent and style. While the book is sure not dry in its voice, the fact that Pepper was and is a lawyer comes through in the clarity and vigor of the writing. Of course, the reader must also keep in mind that Pepper was Ray's lawyer, and therefore the book is, in a very existent sense, Pepper's defense of Ray, because Ray was never given a accredited trial, having been coerced into his confession, which he then withdrew shortly thereafter. This reader believes that Ray was indeed framed, that there was a conspiracy-to-murder and a subsequent cover-up involving individuals in high positions of power at different levels of the government of the United States.

Pepper was involved in the investigation of the assassination for xviii years, beginning in 1978 when he interviewed James Earl Ray in prison and began to believe that Ray did not commit the murder, but was instead framed for the crime. Not only was Pepper Ray's lawyer for years, but he is an attorney who has practiced international, civil rights and constitutive(a) law, having attended the London School of Economics and Political Science, and having calibrated from Columbia University, the University of Massachusetts, and Boston College. His association with the case preceded his interview with Ray, for he was an associate of King himself in the year before the civil rights leader's murder. Therefore, he is qualified to write the book on both a personal and a professional basis.

onal leader xxx years ago, then what has changed that would prevent the government today from committing the same sorts of crimes? This is especially true when one realizes that, if Pepper is true and institutions from the FBI to the local police were involved in the assassination, those people were not caught and punished. in spite of this book and others on the case, despite government investigations, the murderers got away with it, and Ray was framed and died aft
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.