The gaffe was tried in a U.S. District judiciary for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit earlier this year amounted to a tremendous wave of negative publicity for the NCAA. During testimony, arguable basketball coach Bob Knight maintained that "The NCAA had eagle-eyed s
ought to put the NIT out of business" and the NCAA rule "hindered NIT's ability to compete with the NCAA tournament," (Wolverton, 2005, p. A65).
Lawyers for the NCAA countered that the NIT was trying to renege on a 1962 agreement with the NCAA in which it gave the NCAA "first pick of tournament teams," (Wolverton, 2005, p. A65). Myles Brand, president of the NCAA, maintained that its tournament-selection committee does not chose which teams get to twist in the NCIT and that "association officials would do everything possible to ensure that the teams selected to accept in the NIT are chosen in a fair and equitable manner," (Wolverton, 2005, A65).
Wolverton, B. (2005, Sep 2). NCAA settles lawsuit over the National Invitation Tournament. account of Higher Education, 52(2), A65-A66.
Despite such promises of intent, the day the jury began deliberating the case the NCAA decided to voluntarily settle the lawsuit out of royal court for $56.5 million, (Wolverton, 2005). The terms of the settlement allocated $40.5 million to the NIT in
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment